|
|
|
These covers greatly differ from the Star Wars covers we were used to. I can't think of a large number of books whose covers feature an illustration of one or two characters, illustrators always wanted to show a little more. Star Wars books' covers, as I noticed, almost always had a tendency to be composed of a collage of various characters, and abstract backgrounds. This happened more usually with Bantam; I love those covers, but sometimes something different is needed.
When Dark Nest Trilogy came out, I think one learned that not all Star Wars book covers need to be similar, it is the fact that they're different that makes them special.
Legacy of the Force covers are good and have their meaning - and it shows - but in my opinion, they don't seem to have a "root". I mean, when you look at them, they're cute and all, but you don't feel the link between them and your imagination of the story. Well, that's just me!
Concerning the link between the cover, the title and the book itself, I see it this way: If a book is good, a good cover and a good title will only make it better, but if the book isn't that good, a good cover and a good title aren't going to be much help.
I think Legacy of the Force has matching covers and stories, although I have some difficulty accepting the titles. A single-worded title is a great idea sometimes, and it makes sense all of them being that way because of the identity of the series, but after some time it becomes a little boring.
In the case of Legacy of the Force, I think the titles are pretty ambiguous, because when you start reading the book you think it has to do with one thing, but when you finish it, you think that perhaps it has to do with other aspect. It may be meant to be a subjective matter.
Anyway, the illustrations are pretty good, but not everyone imagines some characters the way they are depicted. Me included. _________________ "One quickly learns that the Jedi Code does not give all the answers..."
|
|