|
|
|
| Taral-DLOS wrote: |
| The word "phobe" does not only mean fear. The word "phobe" means something more akin to "does not like". A molecule that is hydrophobic does not like water, and thus does all that is physically possible to avoid it, as opposed to something that is hydrophilic. It is not afraid of water. Therefore, homophobe is as useful a word as any. If there were a better word, I'd go for it ("sexist" would work, but that refers to gender, not orientation). |
Philology time!
| Merriam-Webster wrote: |
| -phobia 1. exaggerated fear of 2. intolerance or aversion for |
Right you are. Actually, I remember hearing about hydrophobic molecules somewhere. An aversion to homosexuality seems as good a description as any. However, I question whether this 'aversion' refers to homosexuality or to homosexuals, as in shunning them. Big difference there.
| Taral-DLOS wrote: |
| I would like to add that, in my opinion, all what Jesus preached (love thy neighbour, etc.) takes precedence over previous text that condemns homosexuality. |
This simply isn't true. God still condemns homosexuality (along with lying, pride, bestiality, murder etc). Jesus didn't make up "loving your neighbour" on the spot, it's in the Old Testament.
| Leviticus 19:18 wrote: |
| You shall not take vengeance, nor bear any grudge against the children of your people, but you shall love your neighbour as yourself: I am the Lord. |
Ah, you might say, this only refers to "the children of your people" AKA the Jews. Not so:
| Leviticus 19:33-34 wrote: |
| And if a stranger who dwells with you in your land, you shall not mistreat him. The stranger who dwells among you shall be to you as one born among you, and you shall love him as yourself; for you were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God. |
| Proverbs 25:21 wrote: |
If your enemy is hungry, give him bread to eat;
And if he is thirsty, give him water to drink; |
Jews like the Pharisees had added the addendum "but hate your enemies" to "love your neighbour".
Hate the sin, love the sinner.
| Taral-DLOS wrote: |
| Therefore, I accept one (and only one) alternative: marriage be distinctly religious; only members of the clergy may marry; only members of those religions may get married; marriage brings absolutely no tax benefits to the couple; and a separate thing (we'll call it Civil Union) may also exist, that does offer all the tax and legal benefits, and is open to all people. |
What is 'marriage' though? If there are any of my fellow Christians on here who know better, please call me out on this, but so far as I know according to Christianity there is no such thing as "sex before marriage". Sex is marriage, or rather consummation is marriage. In the Judeo-Christian sense if a couple gets "married" and never has sex, they aren't technically married. When two people have sex they become "one flesh" and "what God has joined, let not man separate". Absolute faithfulness or total celibacy. The ceremony is a tradition (and a fine one), but so far as I know it isn't essential. So not calling a marriage a "marriage" seems like splitting hairs to me.
I feel like I should clarify before I go that I'm not against gay marriage laws. I think gay marriage is morally wrong, but I think worse things will happen (and have happened) if we organize a stupid witch-hunt against gays. The law isn't justice, it's rules for a safe, free society. For example it's wrong to insult someone, but there isn't a law against it. Nor should there be. _________________
Where sky and water meet,
Where the waves grow sweet,
Doubt not, Reepicheep,
To find all you seek,
There is the utter east.
Last edited by Reepicheep on Thu Mar 29, 2012 9:17 am; edited 2 times in total
|
|