|
|
|
| DarthMRN wrote: |
| What about before? Say, Darth Ruin? Near as I know just a Jedi who declared himself Sith out of the blue. And since Bane was of his line, with the movie Sith following, this defintion would demote them all to untrue Sith. Kinda problematic. |
Eh, I forgot about Darth Ruin. According to GL he was the founder of the Sith, along with the Old Republic only going back 2,000 years. Fortunately, it's been retconned that he just joined the rest of the Sith that already existed at time. Kinda unavoidable. That can be the exception to the rule.
| Quote: |
| Elaborate. In Path of Destruction, Bane clearly permits darksided servants and followers, so long as the formal title and full teachings are limited to a single apprentice. So why does it disqualify Sids? |
I'm saying that is all that he allowed. He just wanted an apprentice as a puppet, not someone to pass on the role of the Sith and certainly not to overthrow him. In DP it says that once he gained immortality he intended to do away with all apprentices and maybe even to do away with the Sith organization. Palpatine's Empire at least cannot be said to be a Sith Empire, compared to those that came before and after.
| Hogy wrote: |
| Krayt was taught by XoXaan, one of the founders of the Sith Lords. So I fail to see how his succession to the Sith has any less credability than Banes. |
Ok, I didn't know that. I guess that it must count then, but only because of retconning new characters into existing stories, like the previous example.
Bane is clearly a true Sith no matter how you slice it, so if Krayt is too, then it just means Bane's line is a schism group... which is Ok, but it sort of makes the whole point of the Rule of Two pointless, doesn't it? and it calls into question the validity of Sidious fulfilling the Grand Plan. I feel that way about the Lost Tribe too. Ok, so I understand why Bantam had to bring the Empire back ten times, but what gives to keep bringing back the Sith and say, "oh, this group that we just introduced 40ABY? yeah, they go back to the Sith from 20,000 BBY." Lame.
As for Dooku, I don't think he counts, I don't believe that he was really Sith, he was just a Dark Jedi who wanted to rule the Galaxy. IMO, he would have overthrown Sidious, not to replace him, but to oppose him and he wouldn't have continued the Sith organization. He was more of an equal to Sidious than an apprentice in that regard, and he used people the same way. That is why he wouldn't make Ventriss a Sith. _________________ They have taken the hearts and minds of our leaders. They have recruited the rich and the powerful, and they have blinded us to the truth! Our human spirit is corrupted. Why do we worship greed? Because, outside the limit of our sight, feeding off us, perched on top of us from birth to death are OUR OWNERS. They have us! They control us! They are our masters! Wake up! They’re all about you, all around you!
|
|