|
|
|
| Darth_Henning wrote: |
I've always though it matters more "WHY" you use the power and what you use it "FOR" rather than WHICH power you use.
For example, if you use force lightening to re-power a dead generator in a crashing spaceship to save the crew, is it really a dark side power? |
By that logic there is no such thing as a dark side power. Yet we know that there are such things as dark side powers.
The dark side is a part of the Force, not a categorization system which segregates behavior into "good" and "bad". You have to use that part of the Force to produce Sith lightning. Even if used for a "good" purpose it is still use of the dark side and thus incrementally corruptive.
| Life Is The Path wrote: |
| True, it is just an application of telekinesis, but it is applied in an aggressive, harmful manner to another being. I'd have thought that would place it in the Dark Side column, even if tapping into the Dark Side isn't required. It could be compared to using a nail gun (neutral tool) against someone's hand (not so neutral application). |
We're essentially talking about two different concepts of "darksidedness" here.
One is tapping into the dark side to produce a dark side-specific Force power.
The other is being a bad person, which in a generalized context need not have anything to do with the Force, but in a Force use context is aligned with the likelihood of having "fallen".
| IllogicalRogue2 wrote: |
| Debunked by the Jedi- the theory is still sound- just not to the Jedi's POV. |
That's why I cited an OOU source in addition to an IU one. It is arguable that the theory has been debunked canonically, because it seems to be contradicted by OOU material about the Force which has appeared in sources such as the Annotated Screenplays.
Last edited by Arawn_Fenn on Sun Dec 11, 2011 5:15 pm; edited 4 times in total
|
|