|
|
|
| illogicalRogue2 wrote: |
| Reepicheep wrote: |
| How have they changed it? I'm not a Hutt expert. |
The big change is the Hutt's mortality. They were very VERY hard to kill, they were hard to poison, and their skin was hard to pierce. As villains before you couldn't "just blast him" kind of thing. And most Hutts seen were hundreds of years old. IIRC the youth would ride on the parent for the first 100 or so years. It's not a major change, but it does effect how the species is perceived.
Before they were super old, now they can be bumped easily and it no longer takes so long for them to reach maturity so their rarity is somewhat diminished. I liked how as a species they were so old. Sure some can still be, but these are Hutts- gangsters - how many gangsters off each other for control? TCW made it easy to off a Hutt which reduces the long lifespans- sure we'll still have exemptions to it. But it changes.
Unless they say some of these Hutts were related to the Shell Hutts and thus were weaker skinned cause they should have been wearing shells but out of pride refused. lol |
Thanks for the info, IR2.
I thought the retcon had something to do with their culture or the way their crime empire was organized so it isn't as bad as I thought. This is pretty easy to write off. _________________
Where sky and water meet,
Where the waves grow sweet,
Doubt not, Reepicheep,
To find all you seek,
There is the utter east.
|
|