Log in to check your private messages
Homosexuality
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 5, 6, 7 ... 12, 13, 14  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    The EUCantina Forums Forum Index » The Meditation Grove View previous topic :: View next topic  
 PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 7:31 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Reepicheep
Master
Master

Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 5963
Location: Sailing into the unknown

I think I'll stick with my pride example. I'm not sure I completely see how the psychopath comparison doesn't work (I wasn't comparing the effects of murder and homosexuality on society, but what is often their cause), but the pride example is sure to ruffle less feathers.

So for me, pride is part of my "identity". For me to fight against my pride, I have to go against my very nature. It isn't as easy as Corellias Dream's example of telling a single lie, it's a constant struggle.

I apologize if anyone is getting tired of religion being brought into the debate (though, really, is there a debate on this subject apart from religion?), but Christianity teaches its followers to go against their nature because it is inherently flawed. Regarding "hate the sin, love the sinner", it also teaches to "love your neighbour as yourself", but how do I love myself? There are some aspects of myself that I really dislike, but I still take care of myself. If you're wondering how you can forgive someone who continually screws up, look at yourself. I've been forgiving myself all my life.
_________________

Where sky and water meet,
Where the waves grow sweet,
Doubt not, Reepicheep,
To find all you seek,
There is the utter east.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

 PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 7:57 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Dog-Poop_Walker
Master
Master

Joined: 28 Jan 2012
Posts: 686
Location: Official Med. Grove Troublemaker

Reepicheep wrote:
is there a debate on this subject apart from religion?


I'm glad that you can admit this and it really gets to what my point is. I don't see how we can have this discussion without offending someone's beliefs unless your perspective is that it doesn't matter. It really does boil down to whether you think it's Ok or not.

As I said way back in the beginning of this thread it's just people saying what they think and unless they are willing to change that, they aren't really responding to what other people are saying, because they are saying the same thing. The only real response has been to dismiss what other people are saying to continue to argue one's own perspective.

Most sociopaths/psychopaths are not murderers. And most murderers are not sociopaths/psychopaths or have any diagnosed mental illness. Sure murder is not a rational behavior, but if being irrational was the only criterion for mental illness than most people would be called crazy. I also find this medical ignorance to be kind of offensive and at the least it makes for a weak discussion.


View user's profile Send private message

 PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 9:14 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Corellias Dream
Knight
Knight

Joined: 03 Apr 2012
Posts: 103
Location: UK

I think some people can be averse to homosexuality for reasons other than their religious beliefs. It could be that they find it 'unnatural' because they aren't inclined that way and can't understand why others are - some people fear what is different. They could have learnt intolerance from peers/family. Some people may have underlying homosexual tendancies that they cannot accept, so they attack homosexuals in order to distance themselves and try to convince themselves that they are not 'that way'.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

 PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:00 am Reply with quote  
Message
  Life Is The Path
Master
Master

Joined: 10 Sep 2010
Posts: 3407
Location: In a galaxy far, far - No, I'm behind you! Got you! Boo!

Taral-DLOS wrote:
@Life: "Only Pagan in the village"... Will you start wearing little hats and attending Myfanwee's bar? (did I spell that right?)


I already wear little hats Wink . And it's spelt as Dream wrote. However, I'd always thought that 'Myfanwy' was pronounced 'mi-fun-oo', though don't take my word on that, as my Welsh pronunciation is a little rusty.

Also, regarding the psychopath comparison, I don't think there's an actual basis for comparison. As sociopaths and psychopaths have a specific gene in common, and is associated with murderous tendencies. However, that gene doesn't mean that people will automatically be evil, but is coupled with what sort of upbringing.

At a stretch, it's possible that there is a gene which controls what your orientation is, and is determined within a few years of birth (through whatever means, hormonal, etc.). However, I favour the non-gene, hormonal-only theory.
_________________
I am a Star Wars fan. That doesn't mean that I hate or love Jar Jar. That doesn't mean I hate or love Lucas, or agree or disagree 100% with him. That doesn't mean I prefer the PT over the OT, or vice versa. That doesn't mean I hate the EU, or even love all of it. These are not prerequisites. Being a man is not a prerequisite. Being a geek is not a prerequisite. The only prerequisite is that I love something about Star Wars. I am a Star Wars fan.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

 PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:47 am Reply with quote  
Message
  Darth Skuldren
Moderator
Moderator

Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 5760
Location: Missouri

Alright, time to join the party. Wink

All other arguments aside, I do have something of interest I'd like to bring up. Now this is not an attack or condemnation on anyone, but sometimes I like to let my imagination wander.

If everyone was gay, would we cease to exist? Would no one reproduce? Or would we seek scientific means to fertilize each other so we could continue as a species?
_________________


View user's profile Send private message

 PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:46 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Reepicheep
Master
Master

Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 5963
Location: Sailing into the unknown

Blast my comparison to pieces, why don't you? Laughing

Yeah, I should probably stick with my pride example. Especially because I'm actually speaking from experience.

@Darth Skuldren: I think it would be like in 1984. Men and women would still have sex, but it would be merely for the sake of survival. It would be viewed as a chore, like picking up litter. The population would drop dramatically as a result.
_________________

Where sky and water meet,
Where the waves grow sweet,
Doubt not, Reepicheep,
To find all you seek,
There is the utter east.


View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website

 PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:41 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Cerrinea
Master
Master

Joined: 09 Jun 2009
Posts: 1410

Quote:
The population would drop dramatically as a result.


Which would actually be a good thing since the world is seriously overpopulated and cannot sustain the rate of current population growth for much longer.

Where's a good black death plague when you need one?
_________________
Roqoo Depot co-founder.


View user's profile Send private message

 PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:40 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Queen Padmè Skywalker
Master
Master

Joined: 17 Jul 2009
Posts: 4931
Location: Sitting in front of a fireplace on Naboo exchanging pathetic dialogue with Anakin


_________________
All things die, Anakin Skywalker, even stars burn out.

So this is how liberty dies....with thunderous applause.



Those without swords can still die upon them

The world is a mess and I just need to rule it.


View user's profile Send private message

 PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:04 am Reply with quote  
Message
  Dog-Poop_Walker
Master
Master

Joined: 28 Jan 2012
Posts: 686
Location: Official Med. Grove Troublemaker

You do know that there are both male and female homosexuals, right? and that some of them even have children, in a variety of ways, for a variety of reasons, as do heterosexuals.

In an all homosexual population, since Men and Women would not be having sex outside of reproduction (if at all) then the only thing that would change would be people not having unplanned pregnancies.

You guys act like they are a freakin alien species. Believe it or not, but they are pretty much the same as you straight people.

I find any talk about the desirability of world population reduction to be racist because if it was applied it would exclusively be targeted at non-white and poor people who lack the resources of advanced medical care, even if it was an "act of god" outside of social design.

Whenever I hear people saying that the world needs to have a population reduction they almost never consider that they themselves are part of the problem that need to be eliminated. The only fair way would be total random sterilization of the population which would be subject to corruption, or for everyone who says that we need to reduce the population voluntarily sterilize and/or euthanize themselves.


View user's profile Send private message

 PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 10:57 am Reply with quote  
Message
  Caedus_16
Master
Master

Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Posts: 4406
Location: Korriban

Dog-Poop_Walker wrote:

You guys act like they are a freakin alien species. Believe it or not, but they are pretty much the same as you straight people.


No, we are not. Stop generalizing. In fact almost everyone here has said that they are people and would never go out of their way to say anything to them about not agreeing with their lifestyle.
_________________
Perfection is a lifelong pursuit requiring sacrifice. The only way to get it quicker is to sacrifice the most.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger

 PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 1:28 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Cerrinea
Master
Master

Joined: 09 Jun 2009
Posts: 1410

Caedus_16 wrote:
No, we are not. Stop generalizing. In fact almost everyone here has said that they are people and would never go out of their way to say anything to them about not agreeing with their lifestyle.


I get where DPW is coming from. I've been reading this entire thread and the general attitude (whether you -- general you -- realize it or not) is that for the most part you tolerate homosexuals. That is not the same as accepting them as human beings. There's still this attitude that they're lesser human beings than heterosexual people.

@DPW: I meant nothing racist about the population growth. The facts are that our world population growth is unsustainable at its current rate. A few decades ago there was a big push for zero population growth in the U.S. and the birth rate did drop. You don't hear much about it now except when it's used for racist purposes -- like if we don't up the birth rates of whites, we're going to become the minority. I hate that kind of racist speech.

And I certainly don't espouse China's draconian methods regarding their growth rate, but China definitely has a serious problem regarding it's population growth.

Really, for the most part if you cut out the religious reasoning for anti-homosexuality, there is no viable argument against it.
_________________
Roqoo Depot co-founder.


View user's profile Send private message

 PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 2:17 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Salaris Vorn
Moderator
Moderator

Joined: 02 Feb 2008
Posts: 2039
Location: New York, USA

Cerrinea wrote:

Really, for the most part if you cut out the religious reasoning for anti-homosexuality, there is no viable argument against it.


I've actually always wondered if homosexuality existed a means of population control and being adapted our communal living paterns in ancient times.

First homosexuals generally won't be reproducing thus you create a decrease in the total potential population then if humans were exclusively hetereosexual.

Second way back in the day humans existed as a community and wasn't todays individualistic nuclear family based. So homosexuals could assist in the maintence of the community/raising of children without contributing to an increase in the population.

Anyway if you assume that some features of humanity are left over from our cave man times it may be that homosexuality is one of those cases which means they aren't "unnatural."

Just my personal theory.
_________________


View user's profile Send private message

 PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 8:54 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Cerrinea
Master
Master

Joined: 09 Jun 2009
Posts: 1410

Hilarious Funny or Die video made by former child stars about Kirk Cameron's recent comments regarding gays.

http://is.gd/1KFhKz
_________________
Roqoo Depot co-founder.


View user's profile Send private message

 PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:34 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Caedus_16
Master
Master

Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Posts: 4406
Location: Korriban

Cerrinea wrote:
Caedus_16 wrote:
No, we are not. Stop generalizing. In fact almost everyone here has said that they are people and would never go out of their way to say anything to them about not agreeing with their lifestyle.


I get where DPW is coming from. I've been reading this entire thread and the general attitude (whether you -- general you -- realize it or not) is that for the most part you tolerate homosexuals. That is not the same as accepting them as human beings. There's still this attitude that they're lesser human beings than heterosexual people.


Like I've said before I see them like anyone else I don't agree with. I don't agree with you over our discussions about Apocalypse, but I don't think less of you for your views on it because its simply who you are and how you see it. I don't think of homosexuals as less, I just don't agree with that aspect of their life but since the ones I spend time with aren't letting it be all of who they are or slapping me in the face with it every time I see them it never comes up. Yes, when you remove religion from the discussion there's nothing to say against it but I'm religious and while it isn't who I am its a part of it. But I don't let that fester a hatred inside me or anything, there's nothing wrong with gay people, they just don't see the world the way I do. It doesn't stop close friendships from developing or me confiding when them. Actually when we go out he's a great wingman and he's more fun than almost anyone else I know. It is indeed a generalization to state that since we don't agree with it we must see them as less than people. I've been reading over the thread and from Mara, Reep, and myself I see a lot of religious people (who must also be tolerated, but not accepted) who's world views contradict those of homosexuals, but it doesn't mean they hate them or are afraid of them, it simply means we believe what we believe. Its just as offensive to just say "you're wrong and you hate gays" as it would be for them to say "gay people aren't people, just psychological mistakes" which is basically a summary of how DPW summed us up. The point of what we were saying was missed entirely, and irony settles in nicely. I'm not attempting to start a fight with anyone, just reminding you all that everyone's opinions are valid on this and because we don't agree with it doesn't mean we're out demonizing homosexuals on the internet. We just don't agree with it and when pressed to discuss it we will, but there isn't hatred of the person just a disagreement with what they do.

EDIT: I would also like to state that I feel no anger at anyone, but I feel I must state that this is the problem with the tolerance system. These days we don't have to be tolerant (read 'acceptance' because that's what they really mean) of people who disagree with things. I'm religious so to most people I'm a backwards moron who has a plate of spaghetti with wings in my shrine in hopes that the flying spaghetti monster will save my un-enlightened butt from the smarter, accepting people. That's unfortunately how most people see us since we disagree with homosexuality, but as I've said I don't see them as any less of a person. I disagree with a lot of people, but it doesn't mean they're any less than I am about something. That's the reason I got frustrated by DPW statement because it is indeed a generalization that is directly shot at those of us who are disagreeing based on religion. We're entitled to agree with it or not, its our choice and I'd like people to remember that this thread was started for discussion. You wanted our opinion, you got it.
_________________
Perfection is a lifelong pursuit requiring sacrifice. The only way to get it quicker is to sacrifice the most.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger

 PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 10:07 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  Dog-Poop_Walker
Master
Master

Joined: 28 Jan 2012
Posts: 686
Location: Official Med. Grove Troublemaker

Cadeus you don't seem to get that it goes both ways. You say that you don't want gay people "letting it be all of who they are or slapping me in the face with it" because that crosses your comfort level, and that's fine, you shouldn't have to be. But whether you mean to or not it creates a schism because it means that those people feel like they can't be who they want to be or express themselves in the way that they want to and that crosses their personal comfort line.

It's not about overt hatred or hostility, which no one on here seems to prescribe to, but ways that people make others feel shut down by things that we do, often unintentionally, because we fail to understand what other people are feeling. That's what I mean when I say that it goes both ways. Often we "agree to disagree" with others in hopes to maintain some sort of equality of comfort, but that doesn't really address the problem, it's more like ignoring it and hoping it will go away.

When you don't allow yourself to see other people as they want to be seen you create a block between yourself and that person. You might say, "we're just two different people" and not see that as a negative thing. In the small scale it's not, but in the large scale it's called "othering". Reducing another person to an "other" that is not like ourselves makes it harder for us to empathize with them because we feel like we don't share a common experience. From there is it only a short step to the way that those people who are othered become marginalized and pushed out of the conversation from the dominant viewpoint that they are not a part of.

They feel like they don't matter because they aren't considered and that leads to the continuation of oppression.

You feel like you are not being treated fairly because people, in this case myself, are making a generalization about how you supposedly feel based on your religion. Now consider that is how homosexual people feel in response to most of the comments on here. (and just because they may or may not be here reading them doesn't mean that they don't encounter the same ideas elsewhere.)

Everyone does it because that is how we are socialized to deal with people, even people on our "level". It takes an intentional effort to do otherwise. I'm not trying to make people on here feel bad for the way they think or believe, I just want them to consider seeing things from other people's perspective's that they might not have been.


Last edited by Dog-Poop_Walker on Thu Apr 12, 2012 10:19 pm; edited 1 time in total


View user's profile Send private message

Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    The EUCantina Forums Forum Index » The Meditation Grove

Page 6 of 14
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 5, 6, 7 ... 12, 13, 14  Next

Display posts from previous:

  

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Jedi Knights 2 by Scott Stubblefield