|
|
|
From a general understanding I have for both, the Brotherhood (Lord Kaan) and the One Sith (Darth Krayt) don't seem all that different. They both raise armies with many, many Sith and that can do more harm than good. Since Sith philosophy a majority of the time aims at promoting the self through competition with other Sith, your army doesn't run very long. Darth Bane's rule of two has been the only one to be very, very effective when it comes to pushing the Jedi back and brining "peace" to the galaxy (Krayt would be in second but I haven't read Legacy since #7 and don't know if they went in more detail with how Krayt more thoroughly came to power.)
So, Brotherhood of Darkness vs One Sith...One Sith has been a lot more effective so maybe they're way of running things is better. However, I don't enjoy the Legacy series so don't read it and am lacking in more details besides who caused more damage to the Jedi and ruled more of the galaxy. _________________ "Changes are nice--but so is continuity!"
"Then you saved my life. How disgusting. How unfortunate."
"No, don't gush on so. It was nothing, really."
|
|